if you're considering Pentium D 830 then the X2-3800 is in that ballparki wouldnt mind an amd x2 but there well expensive. at the moment im liking the pentium d 830 any thoughts and suggestions?
thingsWith the X2- Dual 64 bit processors.... need I say more???
does it?The X2 clearly beats a Pentium D, and for that matter an Intel Extreme Edition as well. X2 would definetly be your better choice.
does it?if u were going with an ee with dual core, why not grab the fx57 or X2 4800+ that both beat it.
Praetor said:does it?
[/i]
I dont know why its surprising [to you] that Athlon64 X2 does better on gaming oriented benchmarks .... nothing new there. While I agree X2 is prolly better overall for most people ... it most certainly doesnt walk away absolutely cleanlyI've read reviews in which the editors were clearly impressed with both, but found that the short pipeline in the X2 4800 and greater memory bandwith helped it edge out the EE840. They provide benchmarking results, which clearly show the X2 as the winner in Aquamark (suprising), 3DMark03 and 05.
What architecture? In either case, the AMD setup has the superior architecture for games ....I always thought Aquamark generally gave Intel better scores than AMD, due to the architecture.
Funny ... because the X2-3800 is in the same price bracket as both of those....i dont care about the x2's cos im not that rich. i want to know what to get out of the pentium d 830 and the athlon 64 4000+ i know the athlon 64 4000+ isnt dual core like the pentium d 830
Where'd you hear this?if it was between those 2, i would go pentium D. Mainly for the better performance in some games
Dont stress it ... its not true.Now that you put it that way, I would go with the Pentium D instead of the Athlon 64 4000+....