xbox 360 ati 512mb vs 7800gtx 512 mb
- Thread starter Pr0
- Start date
Pr0
New Member
Archangel said:i do not agree.
but, you cant compare them, because the xbox games are especially made for that hardware.
yes
Because xbox 360 running ati version of 512 mb videocard. When playing king kong you can see how the graphic's lagg's in the middle of game. Thats because ati's make crappy video cards. Remember the 9800 Pro check out how the 9800 pro loses agaisnt the low class fx 5900 in benchmark. http://www.gen-x-pc.com/geforcefx5900_review.htm
matt12685848
New Member
Pr0 said:
Um... NO!!! Both ATI and Nvidia make fine products
Apokarteron
banned
The XBOX 360's GPU has 512MB RAM?
fatal1ty_fan
New Member
the 7800 is better than any gpu out there
ati came close but they didnt get
but i thing with their next card they will have something better than nvidia
and the xbox 360 only has that good of gfx cuz its a console and the games and u dont have to do any thing but play games but the 7800 still is better
ati came close but they didnt get
but i thing with their next card they will have something better than nvidia
and the xbox 360 only has that good of gfx cuz its a console and the games and u dont have to do any thing but play games but the 7800 still is better
TooMuchButtHair
New Member
maroon1 said:
Nvidia MIGHT have gotten smoked by ATI this time around. The PS3 GPU's specs were specifically with-held once the 360's GPU's specs were released. The reason for this was that the ATI GPU is SMOKIN! Let's do a direct comparison: PS3 GPU has 256MB RAM, Xbox 360 GPU has 512. PS3's GPU is suposed to have half the pipelines the 360's is. . .in an honest and direct comparison, the ATI card wins this round. The PS3 can crunch numbers a LOT faster than the 360 though.
Apokarteron said:
Yeah, and the 360's GPU has 48 pipelines. It's a REALLY good GPU. Developers didn't have much time with the GPU, and that's why games look as poorly as they do. Give it 6 months (or look at Gears of War), and then you'll see PC quality (or better) graphics.
Last edited:
TooMuchButtHair
New Member
Modoman said:
Because the GPU in the PS3 is just a modified GeForce 7800, and Nvidia has released a little bit. Let's compare: PS3 GPU - 24 piplines. 360 GPU - 48 pipelines. PS3 GPU - 256MB. 360 GPU - 512MB. In these two, and very important comparisons, the 360's GPU comes out as a clear winner.
Pr0
New Member
Modoman said:
Ps3 coming out with nvidia video card i dont think it will be 7800gtx it might be lower version 7800gtx with smoke out any graphic cards out there in the market.
As for xbox360 i played king kong for xbox360 and saw that graph glitch while playing at king kong. Also it lagg for 1 second every time when i get into action. Now I played the same game for pc and increased the setting to ultra settings meaning to the max. with this system
Memory Ram: 512 x 4 corsairs
Harddrive: 1x 200GB SATA 2x 74Western Digital Raptor 74GB 10,000 RPM
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ Toledo Socket 939 Dual Core
Motherboard: Abit Fatal1ty AN8 SLi ATX Socket 939 works with athlon,X2 and fx chips
Videocard: 2 BFG-Tech Geforce 7800GTX's "BFGR78256GTXCOD2" VideoCards Sli From "Newegg"
PowerSupply: ENERMAX 12V 660W 90 - 264V Power Supply
Soundcard: Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty FPS Sound Card
Drives: Memorex DVD +- dual
Case:Thermaltake XaserV WinGo V8000A Silver Chassis: 1.0 mm Aluminum, Front Door: Plastic ATX Mid Tower Computer Case
The game performed 180% much better then xbox360 with the 3dmarks and graphics.The game looked as if I was watching kingkong movie for dvd. And the sound quilty. BFG 7800gtx 512 x2 showed me some true graphics. Toobad xbox360 is a loser compare to 7800gtx.
Modoman
New Member
ok. again, you do not know which will be better due to specs alone, especially specs on a console which has not been released. nvidia has released a little bit... the keywords... a little bit. you think sony will release their platform after xbox 360 and have it looks worse? laffable. already sony has the upper hand because they can make last minute changes to make the ps3 superior to what everyone already knows the 360 to be. by default, i think sony is in for the win. mark my words, the ps3 will be undoubtedly better.TooMuchButtHair said:
Archangel
VIP Member
Pr0 said:
im sorry,... but Duh,.. ofcourse that system runs games better than the xbox.. faster processor, 8 timse the ram, sli'd grafics.
but,.. you forgot to mention that it also costs more than 180% of the price a xbox 360 does,.. so.. if you look at it that way, the xbox360 is the better bang for the buck.
TooMuchButtHair
New Member
Modoman said:
Actually, Sony HAS released some pretty detailed specs on the GPU that Nvidia is making for them. This is a comparison of what we know for sure so far:
PS3 Xbox 360
GPU RAM: 256 512
Pipelines: 24 48
From that alone, you SHOULD be able to see that the 360's GPU is more powerful. If Sony does plan to launch the PS3 in Japan this spring, they need to start producing all those graphics cards NOW. ATI started producing the GPU's for the 360 almost 4+ months BEFORE the console launched. You and I both know that it would be marketing suicide if Sony delayed their console - and in all honesty, it looks like that's what they might have to do. I mean, most developers don't even have a working console yet.
Mr.Suave
New Member
lol so your saying a 7800gtx 512mb which has 24piplines must suck compared to the 48pipelines of the Xbox 360. LOL!!! ROTFLMFAO!!!!TooMuchButtHair said:
specs aint everything...
check this out...
a 6800 ultra 256mb has the same performance as a 6800 ultra 512mb
thus the extra 256mb probably wont even matter. this has been the case for many GPU's up untill the 7800gtx 512mb, but you have to consider that the 7800gtx 512mb has a way higher clock speeds than the 256mb...
also Look at the 6800GS vs the 6800GT...the GS is just as good as the GT but has less pipelines....
so just by the specs, the PS3's GPU may or maynot be better than the Xbox 360's.... there is no way of telling which is better until the PS3 is released!!.