xbox 360 ati 512mb vs 7800gtx 512 mb

P11 said:
I think i proved that very well in the PS3 VS. PC thread...but if you dont want to read it all just look at the ign review...it clearly shows the xbox 360 is more powerful. http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/617/617951p1.html
lol hahaha you trust IGN..lol hahaahaha ROFLMFAO!!
and that was done May 20 of 2005...almost a year.....sony can do alot in one year...and how da hell do they get a ps3 and a xbox360 way b4 its release? those could be just the prototypes...prototypes are different that wat is going to be made/officially released...
 
P11 said:
I think i proved that very well in the PS3 VS. PC thread...but if you dont want to read it all just look at the ign review...it clearly shows the xbox 360 is more powerful. http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/617/617951p1.html
that really is funny, no offense. you didnt prove anything in that thread btw...
how can you be so reliant on this:
We decided to put this Microsoft-provided information up undigested. Thus, enclosed is a Microsoft-made comparitive analysis. We have not altered, added, or tinkered with the data. We have not interpreted the specs. We have cut and pasted this information from the email into our site and formatted it. Make of it what you will, but be clear we know Microsoft has clearly slanted this info, and we're not endorsing it, just printing their version. There is a difference.
 
Last edited:
Modoman said:
that really is funny, no offense. you didnt prove anything in that thread btw...
how can you be so reliant on this:
oo...i must have missed that....thats even worse having microsoft explain y thier product is better..lol...so how did they get thier hands on a PS3 anyways? its not like Sony would just hand it too em.:rolleyes:
 
they didnt get their hands on a ps3. nobody has had their hands on a ps3, so everyone is speculating how good/bad it is. that's why the whole debate is retarded to hell
 
TooMuchButtHair said:
Xbox 360's GPU

Core clock: 700MHz - which is faster than the card you posted.
Memory interface: 256 bit
Pixel Pipelins: 48 - DAAAAAAAMN
Memory type: 512MB GDDR3

Does the Xbox 360's card still look like a piece of crap?

who told you that xbox360 core clock is 700MHZ??? that is the memory speed not clock speed.

the xbox360 gpu clock speed is just 500MHZ and PS3 will be 550MHZ

just search for the spec by google before u post
 
TooMuchButtHair said:
Because the GPU in the PS3 is just a modified GeForce 7800, and Nvidia has released a little bit. Let's compare: PS3 GPU - 24 piplines. 360 GPU - 48 pipelines. PS3 GPU - 256MB. 360 GPU - 512MB. In these two, and very important comparisons, the 360's GPU comes out as a clear winner.


the xbox360 has 512MB memory but Total system memory is shared with the GPU, so it will not use all of 512MB for video textures. ps3 has 256MB for system memory and another 256MB for gpu.

And for pipelines, i would like to say that no one now knows untill now how many pipeline does ps3 have, but iam sure that it will be more that 24 pipelines

PS3 has muck more powerfull cpu (7 cores clocked at 3.2Ghz, while xbox360 is just 3 cores clocked at 3.2Ghz)
 
PS3 has muck more powerfull cpu (7 cores clocked at 3.2Ghz, while xbox360 is just 3 cores clocked at 3.2Ghz)
are you sure ?
and for the GPU

"I have no Idea where IGN got these stats !" but by the looks of it the PS3`s RSX G71 ( same sort of chip as the G70 used in the 7800GTX) It`s not as good as the ATi chip in the X360.

I might have got this wrong but by the stats provided by IGN shows the x360 is the winner ?
 
Mr.Suave said:
lol hahaha you trust IGN..lol hahaahaha ROFLMFAO!!
and that was done May 20 of 2005...almost a year.....sony can do alot in one year...and how da hell do they get a ps3 and a xbox360 way b4 its release? those could be just the prototypes...prototypes are different that wat is going to be made/officially released...
You sound like a complete idiot to me, your saying in one years time sony is going to make their system even better...not to mention more expensive. With those specs back in may PS3 was suppose to be priced around 500-700 so your saying they are going to increase performance in the ps3, and that will also increase its price. You should look into marketing 101.
 
epidemik said:
And they also cost around $475 apiece. You all oblviously dont care about money. lucky:D .

There are a lot more distributors of Nvidia cards, PNY, BFG, eVGA, Asus, XfeX i could go on but that doesn't really matter. Personally I think that BFG is the best brand out there but I think its really just a matter of personal taste and how much your willing to put down. And My card dont cost 475. It Cost 549.99 a piece got it from newegg. New - BFG OC version.

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814143043
 
Last edited:
P11 said:
You sound like a complete idiot to me, your saying in one years time sony is going to make their system even better...not to mention more expensive. With those specs back in may PS3 was suppose to be priced around 500-700 so your saying they are going to increase performance in the ps3, and that will also increase its price. You should look into marketing 101.
for one, there is no need for name calling. this is a discussion of GAME CONSOLES, not freakin religion. also, you flaunt that article from ign, but are you by any chance blind enough to not read this, or did you just hope no one would notice
We decided to put this Microsoft-provided information up undigested. Thus, enclosed is a Microsoft-made comparitive analysis. We have not altered, added, or tinkered with the data. We have not interpreted the specs. We have cut and pasted this information from the email into our site and formatted it. Make of it what you will, but be clear we know Microsoft has clearly slanted this info, and we're not endorsing it, just printing their version. There is a difference.
^- this alone DISCREDITS THE ENTIRE ARTICLE, PERIOD.
also, prices for hardware go down, and tweaking the hardware on the ps3 here and there wont necessarily raise the price. it could be advanced drivers that enable what may look like weak specs to some noob to perform beyond the best hardware out now. dont put words in my mouth and say that i said the ps3 will outperform anything on the market, all im saying is there is more to the discussion than pasting hardware specs which most people are VERY misconstrued about.
 
Modoman said:
for one, there is no need for name calling. this is a discussion of GAME CONSOLES, not freakin religion. also, you flaunt that article from ign, but are you by any chance blind enough to not read this, or did you just hope no one would notice
^- this alone DISCREDITS THE ENTIRE ARTICLE, PERIOD.
also, prices for hardware go down, and tweaking the hardware on the ps3 here and there wont necessarily raise the price. it could be advanced drivers that enable what may look like weak specs to some noob to perform beyond the best hardware out now. dont put words in my mouth and say that i said the ps3 will outperform anything on the market, all im saying is there is more to the discussion than pasting hardware specs which most people are VERY misconstrued about.
Modoman:
Quote:
Originally Posted by P11
The PS3 will already be at a very high price with its current specs, not to mention it wont be released with blue-ray. If they were to upgrade it more if they pospond it....it would be a price near the $1000 mark. Sony has never been a company to make their consoles more and more expensive as time goes on, if they do anything they would want to cut the costs. (Seeing as its more expensive then 360)

good point.
...
 
Stop arguring....the xbobx is more powerfulllfor the sole reason the ps3 doesn't exist yet. after then then you can truely see which is better...
 
Xycron said:
Stop arguring....the xbobx is more powerfulllfor the sole reason the ps3 doesn't exist yet. after then then you can truely see which is better...
This was never a Xbox 360 vs PS3 Thread.....O and BTW thanks for resurrecting this topic. :P
 
Back
Top