Post your SuperPi Score!

Status
Not open for further replies.
How about a quick two for now? And given the subject lets make it superpi.

I would say thats close enough to call even wouldn't you?

This is tiny xp and stripped.

4319352507_fce2931986_o.png


Run of the mill retail windows 7

4319352473_9a28c164e6_o.png
 
Just because you got 7 there doesn't mean it's 64 bit

And the CPU in question is the I7 remember? Now that you've been asked atleast 3 or 4 times.
 
87dtna said:
Just because you got 7 there doesn't mean it's 64 bit
Click to expand...

I think you are totally confused and need to reread. That or maybe try and get someone else to help you comprehend my previous posts. Now you are trying to say that 32bit and 64bit effect clock per clock speed? Help me understand you. You aren't making a lick of sense.

Let me break this down into p's and q's for you lil' one.

AMD:

- Frequency attainability (overclocking ability) IS effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Clock per Clock performance IS NOT effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Performance between XP and Windows 7 is negligible and pretty much nonexistent

Intel:

- Frequency attainability (overclocking ability) IS NOT effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Clock per Clock performance IS NOT effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Performance between XP and Windows 7 IS significant with clock per clock performance
 
Last edited:
meticadpa said:
Phenom II's do favor better in a 32bit environment vs. a 64bit. However, the c3 revisions have been tweaked to reduce this effect. Although, it's still there, it does not speak true for intel processors.
Click to expand...


You know, I really think it's hilarious that you post up screen shots of the ''claimed'' windows 7 64 bit OS showing BETTER performance than the x86 XP after saying all this I just quoted up there about Phenom II's. Put down another contradiction :good:
 
87dtna said:
You know, I really think it's hilarious that you post up screen shots of the ''claimed'' windows 7 64 bit OS showing BETTER performance than the x86 XP after saying all this I just quoted up there about Phenom II's. Put down another contradiction :good:
Click to expand...

Those are both x86 operating systems. Not really sure where I "claimed" it was a 64bit OS. I wouldn't say its better performance. Just like I posted a page or two back. AMD does not get hit with a performance penalty like intels do upgrading to an OS beyond xp. As my two pictures reflect. They are within a given percentage to consider them equals.

Now regarding 64bit vs 32bit. AMD's do get a frequency reduction after being deployed into 64bit. However, overclocking ability does not equal clock per clock performance. 1Mhz of cpu frequency is identical in performance regardless it being within 64 or 32bit.

I'll say it one more time for the people with your mindset.

overclocking ability =/= clock per clock performance. Shall I repeat for you again?
 
Last edited:
meticadpa said:
Let me break this down into p's and q's for you lil' one.

AMD:

- Frequency attainability (overclocking ability) IS effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Clock per Clock performance IS NOT effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Performance between XP and Windows 7 is negligible and pretty much nonexistent

Intel:

- Frequency attainability (overclocking ability) IS NOT effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Clock per Clock performance IS NOT effected by 32bit vs 64bit
- Performance between XP and Windows 7 IS significant with clock per clock performance
Click to expand...


Ohhh so now ALL intel is affected, not just the I7 :rolleyes:

Contradiction analysis- Positive
 
87dtna said:
Ohhh so now ALL intel is affected, not just the I7 :rolleyes:

Contradiction analysis- Positive
Click to expand...

I've used a long range of Intel products. Granted I haven't had the pleasure of using anything below a conroe across xp, vista, and windows 7. However, given conroe and up. Yes my statements are true.
 
WHAT THE HELL


I'm gonna go talk to the wall now, it's giving me better results. You answer ZERO questions asked by other people. BYE
 
87dtna said:
WHAT THE HELL


I'm gonna go talk to the wall now, it's giving me better results. You answer ZERO questions asked by other people. BYE
Click to expand...

Where's your proof since you soooooooooo want to prove my statements a fallacy? I fear its b/c you can't find any. Sad, but I knew it was coming. Too bad you didn't.
 
Stop arguing. Please keep this thread discussion limited to superpi scores, or relevant discussion regarding superpi.
 
Aastii said:
I don't really want to get involved in this rather pointless "discussion", but I am interested to know why i7's aren't affected...so why aren't they?
Click to expand...

I don't really know why the i7's don't like 64bit and non-XP. I'm thinking the OS part has to do with how aggressive Intel's thread prediction is. If you guess right you process things faster, if you guess wrong you actually do it a little slower (you have to redo it). My hypothesis is that the i7's thread prediction is wrong more often in vista and 7 than in XP (because of the way the code is handled which I have to treat as a black box because I've no idea). My guess for the 64 bit performance is that AMD has mastered the x86-64 extensions better as they made it up in the first place while Intel borrowed it from them.

87dtna said:
Didn't you read? Because he's seen thousands of benches that prove it :eek:
Click to expand...

You're a touch slow on the uptake with things today. He didn't even ask that. And Meti has some kind of proof, you have none. I think most of us believe him at this point.
 
2048Megabytes said:
I can see people are still posting there results using the old Super-Pi program. Might I suggest we turn our attention to the following and go to this thread:

http://www.computerforum.com/163868-multi-threaded-super-pi-contest.html

Y-cruncher: Multi-Threaded Pi-Benchmark for Multi-Core Systems.

This program is a lot better at measuring processor performance over the old Super-Pi program.
Click to expand...

the only thing is ppl with only a sinlge or dual core with do a lot worse with the multithreaded version vs ppl with quads
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top