Okedokey
Well-Known Member
But I have a 32-bit operating system...
Confirm your specs please, download PC Wizard (in my sig) and install it. File Save as and save the text file. Copy its contents here.
But I have a 32-bit operating system...
Confirm your specs please, download PC Wizard (in my sig) and install it. File Save as and save the text file. Copy its contents here.
and when I try to use the 64-bit it says that my Operating System is not 64-bit.
Yeah we're working on a multi-threaded version! It should be up here for download sooner rather than later... keep your eyes peeled. Once we get that cracked (and we can get the benchmark running for longer) then we can start to this benchmark more as a comparison tool. At the moment it's a bit flawed in this respect. :/To the OP:
If its only dual threaded, then make a version that runs 4 instances at once. Surely one of you clever folk can make that happen?? Also make it run the workloads constantly for 30 seconds. This is both more representative and statistically comparable. As it stands the benchmark is a wild guess.
On the positive, I think it is really impressive that such young people are so clever!
I'll get SmileMan to update the leader board and thanks. Haha yeah we don't want people nicking our work.Also can we update the leaderboard please?
Bigfellla 3.79 seconds.
Btw good job lads, nice collaboration! (i lol'd at the copyright).
Everyone has basically complimented it. If mods consider it a breach ill take it down immediately, but to be honest, there would be very few people on this server that would find it objectionable. You cant see anything more than a beach volleyball player at the Olympics Its also funny that each of you have re-posted the pic via quote lol
To the OP:
If its only dual threaded, then make a version that runs 4 instances at once. Surely one of you clever folk can make that happen?? Also make it run the workloads constantly for 30 seconds. This is both more representative and statistically comparable. As it stands the benchmark is a wild guess.
On the positive, I think it is really impressive that such young people are so clever!
yeah, normally this is already multi-core intensive. Look to my i7 2600k @ 4.6 and Perkomate's i5 2500k @ 4.6. There is a difference from 1.5 second.
I'm working on the parallel-threading and poolthreading. If I got that working it will be an easy job for multi-cores.
the new version will last ~54 seconds with an i7 2600k at stockspeed. So it will be more scaled, intensive and sensitive for multi-cores.
UPDATED list!
Smile & vistakid
So are you saying it is multithreaded?
It sort of is at the moment; but we're giving the benchmark new instructions/code to take advantage of more cores.
Ok, but make sure it understands the difference between cores and threads...
Ok, but make sure it understands the difference between cores and threads...
Could you use the new thread and benchmark please? (see link in the post above yours) Impressive that you got your i3 to 4.7GHz though. How stable is it?
It is stable enough to take screenshot with snipping tool. I just want to post my last picture in this thread but i will take new benchmark then new thread. That's far as i can getting up to CPU's clockspeed and RAM's clockspeed.
PS: It keep shut down due to not have power enough since i increase BCLK.