*Official* Smiles Benchmark Ranking Thread!

Gun

Gun

Member
I am 32-bit. I haven't built my computer yet so I just bought this laptop with Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit installed :p.

and when I try to use the 64-bit it says that my Operating System is not 64-bit.
 
FuryRosewood

FuryRosewood

Active Member
SmileAppBenchFuryRosewood.jpg


5.3313049 Seconds
 
spirit

spirit

Moderator
Staff member
bigfellla said:
To the OP:

If its only dual threaded, then make a version that runs 4 instances at once. Surely one of you clever folk can make that happen?? :) Also make it run the workloads constantly for 30 seconds. This is both more representative and statistically comparable. As it stands the benchmark is a wild guess.

On the positive, I think it is really impressive that such young people are so clever!
Click to expand...
Yeah we're working on a multi-threaded version! It should be up here for download sooner rather than later... keep your eyes peeled. Once we get that cracked (and we can get the benchmark running for longer) then we can start to this benchmark more as a comparison tool. At the moment it's a bit flawed in this respect. :/

I'm also looking into a Save button which will allow you to save your scores and the hardware you used as a text file, which could also be useful. :)

bigfellla said:
Also can we update the leaderboard please?

Bigfellla 3.79 seconds.

Btw good job lads, nice collaboration! (i lol'd at the copyright). :)
Click to expand...
I'll get SmileMan to update the leader board and thanks. :) Haha yeah we don't want people nicking our work. ;)

If you'd like to try the newer version which displays your system information (OS, CPU and RAM), download it here (note: this version is not multi-threaded, that's coming in the next release.)
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
bigfellla said:
Everyone has basically complimented it. If mods consider it a breach ill take it down immediately, but to be honest, there would be very few people on this server that would find it objectionable. You cant see anything more than a beach volleyball player at the Olympics ;) Its also funny that each of you have re-posted the pic via quote ;) lol


To the OP:

If its only dual threaded, then make a version that runs 4 instances at once. Surely one of you clever folk can make that happen?? :) Also make it run the workloads constantly for 30 seconds. This is both more representative and statistically comparable. As it stands the benchmark is a wild guess.

On the positive, I think it is really impressive that such young people are so clever!
Click to expand...


yeah, normally this is already multi-core intensive. Look to my i7 2600k @ 4.6 and Perkomate's i5 2500k @ 4.6. There is a difference from 1.5 second.

I'm working on the parallel-threading and poolthreading. If I got that working it will be an easy job for multi-cores.

the new version will last ~54 seconds with an i7 2600k at stockspeed. So it will be more scaled, intensive and sensitive for multi-cores.

UPDATED list!

Smile & vistakid
 
Okedokey

Okedokey

Well-Known Member
SmileMan said:
yeah, normally this is already multi-core intensive. Look to my i7 2600k @ 4.6 and Perkomate's i5 2500k @ 4.6. There is a difference from 1.5 second.

I'm working on the parallel-threading and poolthreading. If I got that working it will be an easy job for multi-cores.

the new version will last ~54 seconds with an i7 2600k at stockspeed. So it will be more scaled, intensive and sensitive for multi-cores.

UPDATED list!

Smile & vistakid
Click to expand...

So are you saying it is multithreaded?
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
bigfellla said:
Ok, but make sure it understands the difference between cores and threads... ;)
Click to expand...

yeah, it is already multi-core intensive, now we're making parallel-threading function thats gonna make it multi-threaded


current scores!!
congratz bigfella!


TOP 15
1. bigfella (i7 2600K @ 5.1Ghz, 16Gb Gskill DDR3, 3.7950068)
2. SmileMan (i7 2600k @ 4.625GHz, 16GB 1649MHz Kingstone hyperX, 3.9102237)
3. Perkomate (i5 2500K @ 4.6Ghz, Corsair 2x2gig 1866mhz, 4.1023161)
4. Vistakid (i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz, 16Gb 1648Mhz RipJaws-X, 4.1922319)
5. StrangleHold (AMD FX 8120 @ 4.2Ghz, 8Gb G.skill 2133@2000, 4.555208)
6. robtheplod (i7 3770 @ 3.4Ghz, 32Gb ram, 4.6800083)
7. MyCattMaxx ( AMD FX-4100 @ 3.6Ghz, 8Gb PC3 1333MHz, 4.9608086)
8. jonnyp11 (Phenom II 960t x4 to x6 @ 3.8GHz, 8GB 1333MHz, 5.1692042)
9. linkin (i5 2500K @stockspeed, G.Skill Ripjaws X at 1333MHz CAS9, 5.3173041)
10. FuryRosewood (Phenom2 955, 4Gb x4 Crucial DDR3 1333mhz, 5.3313049)
11. ScottAlot (i7-930 @stockspeed, "ram unknown", 6.1400085)
12. SmileMan (i7 920 @stockspeed, 4gb dd3 ram, 6.2712111)
13. Ankur (i7 2630QM, 4GB 1333MHz, 6.8573643)
14. voyagerfan99 ( Core2Duo P8600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4GB Hynix RAM, 7.2696128)
15. Jamesbonds1 ( intel core 2 Q6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4GB DDR2, 7.5600106)


TOP 15 INTEL
1. bigfella (i7 2600K @ 5.1Ghz, 16Gb Gskill DDR3, 3.7950068)
2. SmileMan (i7 2600k @ 4.625GHz, 16GB 1649MHz Kingstone hyperX, 3.9102237)
3. Perkomate (i5 2500K @ 4.6Ghz, Corsair 2x2gig 1866mhz, 4.1023161)
4. Vistakid (i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz, 16Gb 1648Mhz RipJaws-X, 4.1922319)
5. robtheplod (i7 3770 @ 3.4Ghz, 32Gb ram, 4.6800083)
6. linkin (i5 2500K @stockspeed, G.Skill Ripjaws X at 1333MHz CAS9, 5.3173041)
7. ScottAlot (i7-930 @stockspeed, "ram unknown", 6.1400085)
8. SmileMan (i7 920 @stockspeed, 4gb dd3 ram, 6.2712111)
9. Ankur (i7 2630QM, 4GB 1333MHz, 6.8573643)
10. voyagerfan99 ( Core2Duo P8600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4GB Hynix RAM, 7.2696128)
11. Jamesbonds1 ( intel core 2 Q6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4GB DDR2, 7.5600106)
12. MyCattMaxx ( Core2duo E6600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4GB 800MHz Micron PC2-6400, 7.5980321)
13. wolfeking ( intel celeron G530 @ 2.4Ghz, 8GB DDR3 1600MHz, 7.7214417)
...


TOP 15 AMD
1. StrangleHold (AMD FX 8120 @ 4.2Ghz, 8Gb G.skill 2133@2000, 4.555208)
2. MyCattMaxx ( AMD FX-4100 @ 3.6Ghz, 8Gb PC3 1333MHz, 4.9608086)
3. jonnyp11 (Phenom II 960t x4 to x6 @ 3.8GHz, 8GB 1333MHz, 5.1692042)
4. FuryRosewood (Phenom2 955, 4Gb x4 Crucial DDR3 1333mhz, 5.3313049)
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
 
Perkomate

Perkomate

Active Member
number 3 rep... it's interesting to see the difference between the 2600K and 2500K, even though they're close in clockspeed.
 
spirit

spirit

Moderator
Staff member
Could you use the new thread and benchmark please? (see link in the post above yours) Impressive that you got your i3 to 4.7GHz though. How stable is it?
 
Jamebonds1

Jamebonds1

Active Member
vistakid10 said:
Could you use the new thread and benchmark please? (see link in the post above yours) Impressive that you got your i3 to 4.7GHz though. How stable is it?
Click to expand...

It is stable enough to take screenshot with snipping tool. I just want to post my last picture in this thread but i will take new benchmark then new thread. That's far as i can getting up to CPU's clockspeed and RAM's clockspeed.

PS: It keep shut down due to not have power enough since i increase BCLK.
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
Jamebonds1 said:
It is stable enough to take screenshot with snipping tool. I just want to post my last picture in this thread but i will take new benchmark then new thread. That's far as i can getting up to CPU's clockspeed and RAM's clockspeed.

PS: It keep shut down due to not have power enough since i increase BCLK.
Click to expand...

got that problem too sometimes :p
See that no powersaving tool is on :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top