*Official* Smiles Benchmark Ranking Thread!

MyCattMaxx

MyCattMaxx

Active Member
wolfeking, the pic shows your cpu at 100%.
Turn off folding or whatever and try it again.
 
Last edited:
wolfeking

wolfeking

banned
it makes no difference to speak of.
Untitled-68.png
 
MyCattMaxx

MyCattMaxx

Active Member
AMD FX-4100 stock clock 3.6Ghz, 8gigs PC3 1333Mhz
Interrupted my folding to get this one a reboot would probably yield a better time.

HPFX-4100test.jpg
 
jonnyp11

jonnyp11

New Member
MyCattMaxx said:
AMD FX-4100 stock clock 3.6Ghz, 8gigs PC3 1333Mhz
Interrupted my folding to get this one a reboot would probably yield a better time.

HPFX-4100test.jpg
Click to expand...

yeah this bench is no where near reliable, a phenom should be faster at the same speeds, and mine was at 3.8 with 6 cores and was still slower than that :mad: i liked being the fastest amd
 
MyCattMaxx

MyCattMaxx

Active Member
From what I understand, this test isn't using more than 2 cores if I read the thread right.
That is why my E6600 is hanging right there with the Q6600.
 
Last edited:
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
MyCattMaxx said:
From what I understand, this test isn't using more than 2 cores if I read the thread right.
That is why my E6600 is hanging right there with the Q6600.
Click to expand...

I think it's because it are only calculation tests, then it don't have to use more then 2 cores...
But thats good for people without an 4-6-8 core! Then they can compete a bit with use :p
But I see a big difference between my 2600k and the latest ones...
The Ticks can be very important because of the very short test.

UPDATED!

edit: my dad is getting over 9 seconds, he had a 2 core amd (athlon)...
So I want someone with an athlon 4x! I think cores up to 4 make sense.
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
MyCattMaxx, I want to see your overclocked version!
Because my non-overclocked version is in the 4 seconds too!
 
spirit

spirit

Moderator
Staff member
Update: I have found a piece of code which could potentially make this benchmark multi-threaded.
 
spirit

spirit

Moderator
Staff member
Here's a preview of the new version. Now the benchmark retrieves your system information from the WMI, so you no longer need to post what CPU and how much RAM you have (however if your CPU is overclocked you will need to tell us what it is overclocked to). It retrieves this information as soon as it starts up. We are still working on the multi-threading. We've also given the benchmark new instructions so now the benchmarks lasts longer. Once we've got multi-threading (up to 8 threads) working, we will upload the new version.

This is what it looks like at the moment:

Newprev.png
 
Gun

Gun

Member
Mine's been testing for about 3 minutes now. Do I click 'benchmark' or do I wait for it to finnish?
 
Virssagòn

Virssagòn

VIP Member
K, made the code for the new version. It will be multi-core intensive! (it was already multi-core intensive, but the calculations were not that big :p)
Now you'll feel the spirit of 4/more cores!!!
It will take a longer time to benchmark because of the new, heavy calculations.
Only 64bit systems will be running it because the 32bit version is a fail...

new features:

- info about your cpu, ram and OS
- new passes: special pass - normal pass - heavy pass - soft pass
- A better scaling program!
(- with old features init)

We'll release it soon! Hold your pc ready for deployement!

SmileMan & Vistakid10
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top