FuryRosewood
Active Member
AMD already has 12 core chips, but their opterons and as far as i can tell their not based on bulldozer
AMD already has 12 core chips, but their opterons and as far as i can tell their not based on bulldozer
It is true AMD have 12 core but that is for workstation and sever system. Not a gaming chip.
I don't have one, but I would personally try one if possible. But I am only seeing them for 300+ USD so not a chance as the system to use it would be mondo expensive.I want to see that opteron in this bench
somebody has one?
I don't have one, but I would personally try one if possible. But I am only seeing them for 300+ USD so not a chance as the system to use it would be mondo expensive.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/AMD-OPTERON...70?pt=CPUs&hash=item4abb2e0972#ht_3215wt_1139
Current scores:
![]()
And if you think about it, then you are still only overthreading it. The cores would still be slower than intel, but you won't get 48 thread out of intel without 4 6cores with HT on.Some motherboard can hold 4 CPU in one.
AMD already has 12 core chips, but their opterons and as far as i can tell their not based on bulldozer
And if you think about it, then you are still only overthreading it. The cores would still be slower than intel, but you won't get 48 thread out of intel without 4 6cores with HT on.
So. Another reason to get ultimate!Plus it requirement Windows 7 Pro for more than 24 Thread.
If your going to be running server hardware...probably going to be using windows server no?
So. Another reason to get ultimate!
no, but they are great at number crunching and such. EEC ram helps that too. But that is still not a reason to spend an extra 600 or so on windows server. Pro or Ultimate would do just fine and still be able to use everything necessary to run it as a workstation.
it is stealing base.