Black Hole V2

Current scores:

benchmarktablev2.jpg
 
Good scores! Especially the multithreaded one!
I hope amd is working on the performance per core for the vishera!
I still put hope since the fx isn't that bad...
 
Later on I will bump up the HT and then see if I can get a few more 100mhz. out of the CPU.

Edit. I've heard that Vishera suppost to be 10/15% faster then Trinity. Some core enhancements that Trinity doesnt have. I guess it varys with the extra L3 cache depending on what your running.
 
Last edited:
I got two other systems, one with a Phenom 8750 and another one with a Phenom II 720. If I get time, might run it on them just to see what a tri core will do.
 
So the vishera gonna score here ~890 in stock. That would be a nice improvement since the i7 3770 scores only a little more
 
I dont think it would get to 890 but thats me, currently with Speedstep on, and in balanced mode mine is around that...would probably be in the 750 range id be willing to bet. still then thats a sizable improvement, espically stock
 
FuryRosewood said:
I dont think it would get to 890 but thats me, currently with Speedstep on, and in balanced mode mine is around that...would probably be in the 750 range id be willing to bet. still then thats a sizable improvement, espically stock
Click to expand...

If you are right, the new vishera gonna stay slower then an i5 2500k/3570k in overall...
I'm still putting hope in the performance per core, if that would score the same as an i5. Then I will say "amd, you got it!".
 
Just to let Smileman and people know, if anyone here actually takes my first place, i will OC my CPU even more. I don't care if the thing blows up, i am keeping that first place! xD
 
KasperL said:
Just to let Smileman and people know, if anyone here actually takes my first place, i will OC my CPU even more. I don't care if the thing blows up, i am keeping that first place! xD
Click to expand...

Yeah man, I gonna oc my i7 until 6ghz to pown you :p.
First getting a better mobo ;D
 
SmileMan said:
So the vishera gonna score here ~890 in stock. That would be a nice improvement since the i7 3770 scores only a little more
Click to expand...

Dont know what really happen. Money probably. To start with after the FX Zambezi was suppost to be FX Komodo. From what I understand is was suppost to be up to 10 cores and L3 cache with a GPU using Steamroller cores and fit socket F2 so all CPUs would use one socket. Then it just disappeared. Then they decided to extend socket AM3+, came up with FX Vishera using a updated Trinity piledriver core.

After Vishera and Trinity pretty sure they will be one socket, what ever that will be (F3). A lowerend APU with no L3 and a upperend FX APU with L3 thats unlocked.
 
If you made a single core benchmark, you could shut off all cores except for one of them, run it at 6ghz and still keep relatively sane temperatures.
 
SmileMan said:
If you are right, the new vishera gonna stay slower then an i5 2500k/3570k in overall...
I'm still putting hope in the performance per core, if that would score the same as an i5. Then I will say "amd, you got it!".
Click to expand...

just would be hard for them to jump 2 generations right now, may not be impossible, but if they figure out the IPC to maybe double what they have now, that would be acceptable performance. but as far as i see with amd their about two gens behind, if they get within one, that would be awesome. would even consider putting that in my lanparty rig, but currently thats going to be a phenom ii 955 with 16 gig ram and whatever gpu i settle on...selling the 460 soon.
 
StrangleHold said:
Dont know what really happen. Money probably. To start with after the FX Zambezi was suppost to be FX Komodo. From what I understand is was suppost to be up to 10 cores and L3 cache with a GPU using Steamroller cores and fit socket F2 so all CPUs would use one socket. Then it just disappeared. Then they decided to extend socket AM3+, came up with FX Vishera using a updated Trinity piledriver core.

After Vishera and Trinity pretty sure they will be one socket, what ever that will be (F3). A lowerend APU with no L3 and a upperend FX APU with L3 thats unlocked.
Click to expand...

Amd didn't have enough money for that. And that would be dumb, they first need to fix their performance per core before they release the 10core...
 
Not really. They are (at least from what I see) pandering to the people that know nothing of computers. Those people (my mum included) see 8 core and automatically say it is better than 4. They don't research what is better as far as IPC is concerned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top