jonnyp11
New Member
steam box ftw?
Wouldnt say ftw and doubt it will be adopted as well as it should be
steam box ftw?
With Xbox One, games are so lifelike, you’ll swear
they’re real.
In 10 years, we'll laugh so hard at this statement.
A 8 core cpu,8gb ram,& blu ray format seems pretty much up to date to me.Hell I still don't have a bluray lol.Imo it isn't far off from being a decent pc.I read it has IE,finally a web browser!Lol.For $600 I was expecting much better,wonder how good of a pc build you could get with that.That is what game console companies are facing up against.I also read the HDD isn't removable like the 360s,what the hell.Even if it is a dolled up version of the 360 it's about time.In PC hardware years It's pretty old.
Yes. Let's compare 2 different platforms by using two different games...Really? Comparing Crysis 3 to the new CoD doesn't show/prove anything. The difference has nothing to do with hardware, the game companies' decision of how much quality they wanted to achieve in their graphics. Compare the same game on both platforms. While the PC version will still look better, the difference will be marginal.
And even besides that, you would probably have to spend a lot more than the new Xbox will cost to run Crysis 3 at max settings. So, there's that.
Not saying this article is accurate, but as a reference point, it says to run Crysis 3 on "High Performance Settings" (Note that it doesn't say "Max Settings"), you'll need a setup that consists of something like an i7 2600, and a GTX 680. So, that alone can easily net over $600 (Assuming the the Xbox is at that price point), not to mention the rest of the components you need...
And Spirit, rendering a static 3D model isn't really comparable rendering a virtual world with numerous animated objects.
Thanks for the laugh: 'EA exec says Xbox One/PS4 are a generation ahead of top-spec PCs'
Really now, eh?