Black Hole V2

Denther said:
Yeah I made it into last place! :D Kind of amusing since overall I still have a pretty good processor, just all of yours are crazy. I'll download the new one and try again. And btw my name has an H in it. You just had Denter.
Click to expand...

OW, btw...
I forgot your scores and gave the award of slowest to spirit. Gonna correct that in a minute :P.
You can find the awards in the previous thread from the v1.1
 
SmileMan said:
OW, btw...
I forgot your scores and gave the award of slowest to spirit. Gonna correct that in a minute :P.
You can find the awards in the previous thread from the v1.1
Click to expand...

:( That's my award, you ain't taking it away from me. I succeeded at losing! :P
 
I just ran again with new version and got 302. I'm done with this Bench. Never seems to work for me.
 
SmileMan said:
Haha, just don't give up the mood! there are alot of other benches that can say your cpu is fairly good.
Click to expand...

Hahaha lol. :D

Denther, I'm really not sure why this isn't working for you - anybody else out there got a Phenom II X4 which Black Hole can be tested on? I know a few members have 'em.
 
My CPU is fine. Just the Benchmark doesn't like me or Phenom II architecture.

Also of note the bench while sitting open but not running was making me lag a lot in a game. I didn't remember it was on but turned it off and it's better now.
 
Do you know if this benchmark is heavily dependent on L3 cache? Was thinking that if it was, AMD would do better if you bumped up its hypertransport bus. The L3 runs at the same speed as the HT runs.
 
StrangleHold said:
Do you know if this benchmark is heavily dependent on L3 cache? Was thinking that if it was, AMD would do better if you bumped up its hypertransport bus. The L3 runs at the same speed as the HT runs.
Click to expand...

L1, L2 and L3 cache are working together to get the best performance. The benchmark is dependent on all 3. The hypertransport bus used by AMD and will provide more bandwidt and let the operations between eachother go faster.
It will depend on all that I think...

Strangehold, we still didn't see your scores. I think the singlethreaded is fixed, now everything is ok.
 
Last edited:
becnv2.png

960Tx6 @ 3.7 1.44v
4 gigs ram
 
this bench seems more accurate, as I was beating some i5's last time, as much as I love my 960T, its not that good aha.:P

Ill see if I can go a lil further with my clocks, not sure on that voltage, plus my 30$ mobo ;)
 
Last edited:
mx344 said:
this bench seems more accurate, as I was beating some i5's last time, as much as I love my 960T, its not that good aha.:P

Ill see if I can go a lil further with my clocks, not sure on that voltage, plus my 30$ mobo ;)
Click to expand...

Yep, thats the thing amd is known for. The performance per core is not that good. But you got really good multithreaded scores! Maybe if you oc a bit more, you'll come in the top!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top