Is it actually any different to CS:S apart from the graphics?
No nightvision, no flashlight, no bhopping. Extra fog, less colour, more useless post processing, some new weapons, a crappier user interface, a worst scoreboard, not developed by Valve...
You seem to be butthurt. We'll see when it is released.
Yes. Yes we will *snigger*
Joke's on the people who've bought it, not I. I know it's only $15 but hey... It's $15 better spent elsewhere.
No nightvision, no flashlight, no bhopping. Extra fog, less colour, more useless post processing, some new weapons, a crappier user interface, a worst scoreboard, not developed by Valve...
Yes. Yes we will *snigger*
Joke's on the people who've bought it, not I. I know it's only $15 but hey... It's $15 better spent elsewhere.
No nightvision, no flashlight, no bhopping. Extra fog, less colour, more useless post processing, some new weapons, a crappier user interface, a worst scoreboard, not developed by Valve...
Sounds just as shit as regular counter strike
You are getting the opinion who is biased due to being severely butt hurt for apparently no reason other than it is a bit foggy. The game is a lot of fun, it is like CS 1.6 and CSS, but still very good, I prefer the "crappier" interface, I quite like the "worst scoreboard" and I could care less who develops it, it is a fun game
Yes. Yes we will *snigger*
Joke's on the people who've bought it, not I. I know it's only $15 but hey... It's $15 better spent elsewhere.
The thing is, I want to like the game. I played it for months and gave my feedback, bug reports, suggestions, all on the assumption that things would change for the better. So far all changes have just been bug fixes and cosmetics. The sound engine update was very nice but it still doesn't fix the underlying issues with the game.