starlitjoker
New Member
im getting sick of this game. I want Battlefield bad company now plz
if you are one of the people that gets pissed off at it, you can piss them off back by using a noob tube on them, just drop it just behind them and boom, they dead![]()
love it! love it! love it! love it!
what's everyone's best time in SSDD? i got 34 secs. you need to get under 30 to unlock the achievement/trophy.![]()
just finished campaign for a second time, this time on veteran!![]()
That's because players don't care about teamwork. I know that I only care about teamwork when all my friends and I are playing together, but when I'm with a bunch of random, idiotic guys, I could care less.well i've notice one major flaw with multiplayer (for 360 anyway). the way IW has set up matchmaking, causes people to be totally selfish. most people care more about their k/d ratio, accuracy, kill count, challenges, etc. than actually winning the game. i can't tell you how many times people have jumped in front of me to steal my kill, and then die 3 seconds later. about half the objective games i get into, consist of camping and exploiting the objective points to rack up a bunch of cheap kills. they seriously need to consider putting in some kind of punishment for losing games..
the gameplay is great, but the majority of games are just not competative enough for me.
That's because players don't care about teamwork. I know that I only care about teamwork when all my friends and I are playing together, but when I'm with a bunch of random, idiotic guys, I could care less.
Yeah thats always been a problem in Multi fps online i think....come to think about it though i was in a game a few nights ago where we stuck together and covered each other as we moved....worked very well.
exactly, it works well. but where is the incentive to do that? where is the incentive to win games! online gaming used to be about winning! not personal performance, or some stupid challenges or statistics.
i really think call of duty is missing something that is crucial to a competative online gaming experience.
i'm sure i'll get bashed for mentioning halo, but in that game, if you lost your level dropped! and therefore people were more concerned about winning, rather than getting the highest kill count.
At least in call of duty the people that aren't that great can level up and not have to worry about dropping.
this is where i have a problem.
Why are you bothered that not very good people can get stuff anyway? If they are that bad it shouldn't be hard to kill them regardless of their class![]()
the fact that you really don't have to be good in cod to achieve anything significant. it's mainstream gaming at it's best.
on the other hand i think the game play aspect of cod is very very good, with some minor tweaks to matchmaking, i think it could be a hell of a lot more competitive.
did you read my previous posts?
Yes, but regardless of whether you go up or down in rank bceause of winning or losing, if you suck at the game then it will take much longer to get anything decent than a good player, so although you aren't as good, you have to work a hell of alot harder because you have to put in more time, so you do deserve it even then, not for skill, but for determination
even still. you're working ONLY for your own reputation, you aren't playing the damn game to win!
Why does it matter if you win you don't get anything it's just a game. I play for fun I don't care if I win or loose or if a get 1 kill and die 50 times as long as I have fun. I'm not saying I don't like to win or get a lot of kills but stuff like that isn't important to me. People that are worried about that kind of stuff just need a reality check so they can see how unimportant killing somebody in a game is.
MW2, when I get it, will be purely for fun, not for the competative side like CoD4 is