Post your CS:Source Video Stress Test results

im also thinking he deleted the textures so it just shows a solid black screen...i don't think its possible for an x1900xt to get that high on source

How do you delete the textures? Let me know so i can delete them and repost my scores. Pretty Please :D :D
 
Last edited:
I just love how this generation of video cards are so powerful.

That just doesn't make alot of sense lol.
How can your system pull over 100fps more than mine when the you only have a 400mhz increase in cpu speed.

I even have an extra gig over you, not like it matters to much in this game, but sheesh.

I feel jipped.
 
That just doesn't make alot of sense lol.
How can your system pull over 100fps more than mine when the you only have a 400mhz increase in cpu speed.

I even have an extra gig over you, not like it matters to much in this game, but sheesh.

I feel jipped.


HA! The X2 4800+ is WAY better than the 3800+ (which I have) Not only is it 400 mhz its also dual 1mb L2 Cache's rather than dual 512kb.... it is commonly known that the 4800+ beats even the FX-57 in many benchmarks (not to mention it costs 1/2 the price of it)
 
I know all of the specs of them both.

I just don't feel that the difference in specs would yeild over 100more fps with the same gfx card and when he has less ram.

Bob

It just seems strange, thats all. I never did feel like my system was performing at par lol.
 
I know all of the specs of them both.

I just don't feel that the difference in specs would yeild over 100more fps with the same gfx card and when he has less ram.

Bob

It just seems strange, thats all. I never did feel like my system was performing at par lol.
Well, have you done a fresh install of Windows recently? That might be some of the problem. Also, the standard check of any other processes... :)
 
Actually I reformat prob once every two months lol

And when I'm gaming, I usually make sure nothing else is running in the background.

Does my fps seem low to you too?

Thanks
Bob
 
Possibly, with so many different possible bottlenecks on a computer, it's hard to really tell... But, my guess is that you might have some setting on that he doesn't that makes it really off, in addition to the bottleneck issue. Not to say that his wouldn't still perform better, but there's probably some relatively minor issue that's being exaggerated in this one game...
 
Don't have a screenshot atm since I'm not running a X800GTO2 anymore, I'm on a S3 ViRGE with 2MB or vRAM, whoah, anyways, I'm getting a 7900GT so I'll prolly post then.

With my old GFX card I got ~150 on 1024x768, maxed out, 6X/16X

Computer specifications:
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice E6 @ 2.8 GHz (1.55V)
Asus A8N5X nForce4 Socket 939 Motherboard PCI-Express 16X
1 GB Corsair ValueSelect DDR400 Dual Channel 2-3-3-6 1T (2.8V)
Sapphire ATI Radeon X800GTO² @ 450/555 16 Pipelines (R430)
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 8 40GB 7200rpm Ultra ATA133
Hiper 4S350-SU 350W ATX 2.2 PSU 30A @ 12V
17'' CRT Samsung SyncMaster 753DFX
Windows XP Home Edition SP2
 
Last edited:
Don't have a screenshot atm since I'm not running a X800GTO2 anymore, I'm on a S3 ViRGE with 2MB or vRAM, whoah, anyways, I'm getting a 7900GT so I'll prolly post then.

With my old GFX card I got ~150 on 1024x768, maxed out, 6X/16X

Computer specifications:
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ Venice E6 @ 2.8 GHz (1.55V)
Asus A8N5X nForce4 Socket 939 Motherboard PCI-Express 16X
1 GB Corsair ValueSelect DDR400 Dual Channel 2-3-3-6 1T (2.8V)
Sapphire ATI Radeon X800GTO² @ 450/555 16 Pipelines (R430)
Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 8 40GB 7200rpm Ultra ATA133
Hiper 4S350-SU 350W ATX 2.2 PSU 30A @ 12V
17'' CRT Samsung SyncMaster 753DFX
Windows XP Home Edition SP2

Make sure you spend your money upgrading that cpu first. Trust me even if you buy 7900gt you wont get more then 150-160. That game is cpu-limited. Look at what skidude has on his test. ;)
 
Last edited:
Even so, if he "only" gets 150 FPS, that would be plenty to play that game or any other game...

#33 wins :D

pr0, how fast do you finish 1M digits on superPI?

31 secs for me

As for the upgrading, I returned my GFX card to the store (cuz the vRAMS failed, artifacts even on booting), so they offerd me to buy something in the price range since they don't have those cards anymore. I can't upgrade my CPU yet, WTF my CPU ROX, blah, for gaming at least, don't do much multitasking.
 
Last edited:
#33 wins :D

pr0, how fast do you finish 1M digits on superPI?

31 secs for me

As for the upgrading, I returned my GFX card to the store (cuz the vRAMS failed, artifacts even on booting), so they offerd me to buy something in the price range since they don't have those cards anymore. I can't upgrade my CPU yet, WTF my CPU ROX, blah, for gaming at least, don't do much multitasking.

I dont know what this pi does but this what I got
pidk1.jpg


Is that good or bad?:confused:
 
I dont know what this pi does but this what I got
Is that good or bad?:confused:

It's good, wait a sec.

EDIT:
Are you sure you didn't accidently pushed MS Paint and accidently edited that pic, edited in way so it looks it's finished fasters than it's suppose to.

Tell me, is your CPU running on stock speeds, if so, there is no way it finished so fast, world record is 12 secs.
 
Last edited:
It's good, wait a sec.

EDIT:
Are you sure you didn't accidently pushed MS Paint and accidently edited that pic, edited in way so it looks it's finished fasters than it's suppose to.

Tell me, is your CPU running on stock speeds, if so, there is no way it finished so fast, world record is 12 secs.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v281/jwright77/Conroe/14_766s.jpg

No i did not edit or anything but when you said 12 is worlds record is that on the current stock speed?
 
No i did not edit or anything but when you said 12 is worlds record is that on the current stock speed?

Nope, OC'ed of course, somewhere around 4 GHz, I may be wrong but I think it's 4 GHz.


EDIT:

Intel, Core 2 Extreme x6800, Conroe, 4.151GHz
 
Back
Top