Geoff
VIP Member
Nice job spamming today.
56 posts today.
Just to get a score posted here...
That's what's laughable, my friend. Almost...![]()
I noticed that too, most are simple few word answers as well.
Nice job spamming today.
56 posts today.
Just to get a score posted here...
That's what's laughable, my friend. Almost...![]()
mep pretty much knew he was going to do that
Nice job spamming today.
56 posts today.
Just to get a score posted here...
That's what's laughable, my friend. Almost...![]()
[-0MEGA-];1405392 said:I noticed that too, most are simple few word answers as well.
mep pretty much knew he was going to do that
seriously? can you guys quit your bitching and moaning? he got the 100 post requisite so his scores are now valid, what's so hard to understand about that?
Next stop, 1000 post requirementand maybe a years membership...
Bodaggit, would you prefer that he only posts at your average, around 17-18 per day (LOL).
NOW WHAT?
If you really want to know, having the fastest SuperPi/3dmark score isn't going to make you satisfied. Getting x number of posts isn't going to satisfy you.
As I said in the other thread, yes he joined in 2007 but he wasn't active until January of 2010.So, a member from 2007 posts his score. It's too high (or too low, in this case), the members here feel they cannot compete, so we add a post count requirement. He makes the the posts, now people complain that his posts aren't good enough... go so far as to accuse him of spamming. Now what do you want? Does each post have to be a three paragraph response for the scores to be considered? Or, Bodaggit, would you prefer that he only posts at your average, around 17-18 per day (LOL). Would that be okay? Should I delete his posts and make him start over? Then we can create a special committee that will approve each post?
Just update the threads with his scores already.
We have more than a few members here that post one - two sentence responses on a regular basis. It's quite common on internet forums as both the writer and reader prefer to get to the point.
Yes, I noticed that and personally don't have a problem with it. They weren't shit contributions.
FYI, this was apj's idea and I agreed, so not sure why I am getting all the flack for this new rule. The new rule was added simply to limit the number of new users posting a score and leaving. If you don't plan to leave, then stay a few days and post, then submit your score and help others here.You know what's laughable? Omega banning new members from a thread because they know how to run spi, people not listening to these members to improve their own time and instead harassing them. Oh and don't forget the hissy fit, I literally lol'd at that.
Mep, I think we know what happens when any of us makes a 3 paragraph response, it is flamed beyond all recognition.
If you don't like it, then leave. I've been a member of OCN for years, yet I have a couple posts as well, same as a certain someone here.Next stop, 1000 post requirementand maybe a years membership...
Dude, unlike you I don't spend hours on this forum. I will update the thread in a couple weeks, like I have been doing ever since I created this thread. You've been around since 2007 so I assume you would know how things are done here.Can't a dude post? I did want to hit the 100 post mark just so I could post...However, my posts were not crap. I did make every attempt to "contribute" to those posts. I waited my 30 seconds and went on to the next post. It wasn't easy to invest that amount of time.
Yet, I have over 100 and I still haven't posted scores...NOW WHAT?
Yes, I never said I wasn't going to post the new scores.I'm sure OMEGA will update the scores soon. This should be settled by now, so I think it would be best for everyone to get back on topic, including myself, and continue posting and discussing scores.![]()