Now that I think of it, that could have two meanings:
more as an adj modifying admins (we need more good admins), or more as an adj modifying trustworthy (we need better admins)... pretty big difference
Noted however is the "trustworthy" adjective required?
I have to disagree with some of you and agree with others... this forum is virtually spam free.... Everytime we see spam we take care of it within a few hours... You would be hard pressed to find any forum with that kind of record.
LOL the other forums I used to manage had that kinda track record
(>300,000 members) but yeah I can definitely say not a lot of spam here that isnt dealt with pretty quickly. As for this forum, the only reason "spam" has even been
noticeable is purely because of the massive growth surge of the forum. CF has grown (membercount/postcount) on a scale that rivles what those 300K-500K member forums grow by. Translation: if it grew more gradually you wouldnt have noticed
anyway I like the fact that Praetor mentioned "CF doesnt do pre-censoring".
LOL yeah cuz the first question that comes up is "censorship based on what?" lol and thats just not feasible.
WELL... I guess we could consider Praetor a spammer.. I mean, 41+ posts a day!?! ...LOL!
Yeah, free ipods, free ipods, come get yer free ipods.
Prefixing an offtopic post doesnt make it any better