A person's age has no bearing on their intelligence. Quality over quantity, meaning the quality of what someone knows is FAR more important than the time it took them to learn it. In that respect, I would imagine even kids of 13-14 could (and do) know more about this topic than you do.
Only someone who has nothing left to say brings up the challenger's age as some kind of proving point. What will you point out next, the speed of their computer, the amount of money they have invested in their computer? All meaningless, irrelevant points that only someone who is already beaten even bothers to mention.
Only someone who has nothing left to say brings up the challenger's age as some kind of proving point. What will you point out next, the speed of their computer, the amount of money they have invested in their computer? All meaningless, irrelevant points that only someone who is already beaten even bothers to mention.