4W4K3 said:
some of us are here a matter of minutes in the day. i jsut
oooops you typed too fast beatche! sorry but you still need t tell the masses why AMD is better. All though this is esentialy a personal choice we need to expand. Are you really a post surgical trans....sorry.... tell us the truth about your stats. I would like to see to contrast what AMD has given to me.
???you make no sense???
you called me something...but i don't know what.
You asked me to "explain my stats"...you mean my signature? It's a Mobile 2600+ running at 2.4-2.6GHz (tweaking as PSU is giving out, currently 2.4GHz)
You want to know why AMD is better? Or why i chose it myself personally? I chose AMD because it is cheaper than Intel, and gives me ~the same performance for what i use. It was also what was popular at the time of purchase so i was convinced to go with a Mobile XP chip. Now i might have gone with a P4 if i REALLY knew about computers at the time and had a bigger budget, but i was eager to get an overclocking setup. At this time i still am a big AMD fan and am saving for an A64 rig, becasue they are fast, then next wave of technology, and probably will be the standard in years to come.
And it's not my job to "tell the masses" just because i am an AMD customer. I buy my products for myself and hold my opinion on no one. If they ask, then i will tell, but i don't need to convince them or convert them to buy AMD for any reason...