Virssagòn
VIP Member
can't with VB I think
It's a bit limited...
haha, found how to!!
Making the code now, I'll add it soon (it will not affect scores).
*Official* Smiles Benchmark Ranking Thread!
- Thread starter Virssagòn
- Start date
haha, found how to!!
Making the code now, I'll add it soon (it will not affect scores).
MyCattMaxx
Active Member
Here is my bad boy Dell Optiplex 745.
Intel c2d E6600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4gigs Micron PC2-6400
Intel c2d E6600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4gigs Micron PC2-6400
Last edited:
Jamebonds1
Active Member
UPDATED!
ty for scores, I want someone who owns me!!
I just benchmark my computer and it is .1 sec and overclock at 1000 GHZ CPU
Virssagòn
VIP Member
Wow, I see there is a big difference between the seconds now!
1. SmileMan (i7 2600k @ 4.625GHz, 16GB 1649MHz Kingstone hyperX, 3.9102237)
2. Vistakid (i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz, 16Gb 1648Mhz RipJaws-X, 4.1922319)
3. jonnyp11 (Phenom II 960t x4 to x6 @ 3.8GHz, 8GB 1333MHz, 5.1692042)
4. Ankur (i7 2630QM, 4GB 1333MHz, 6.8573643)
5. voyagerfan99 ( Core2Duo P8600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4GB Hynix RAM, 7.2696128)
6. Jamesbonds1 ( intel core 2 Q6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4GB DDR2, 7.5600106)
7. MyCattMaxx ( Core2duo E6600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4GB 800MHz Micron PC2-6400, 7.6540143)
1. SmileMan (i7 2600k @ 4.625GHz, 16GB 1649MHz Kingstone hyperX, 3.9102237)
2. Vistakid (i5 2500K @ 4.3Ghz, 16Gb 1648Mhz RipJaws-X, 4.1922319)
3. jonnyp11 (Phenom II 960t x4 to x6 @ 3.8GHz, 8GB 1333MHz, 5.1692042)
4. Ankur (i7 2630QM, 4GB 1333MHz, 6.8573643)
5. voyagerfan99 ( Core2Duo P8600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4GB Hynix RAM, 7.2696128)
6. Jamesbonds1 ( intel core 2 Q6600 @ 2.4GHz, 4GB DDR2, 7.5600106)
7. MyCattMaxx ( Core2duo E6600 @ 2.4Ghz, 4GB 800MHz Micron PC2-6400, 7.6540143)
robtheplod
New Member
Here's mine (i7 3770 with 32GB of RAM)
Virssagòn
VIP Member
I just benchmark my computer and it is .1 sec and overclock at 1000 GHZ CPU
post it then and benchmark again, can be a bug
Virssagòn
VIP Member
Here's mine:
specs plz, and place your results like me in the ranks.
Virssagòn
VIP Member
it scales good, my overclocked i7 2600k does 3.9 seconds, non-overclocked is 4.7 seconds...
Jamebonds1
Active Member
but I do not trust the scores. The G530 in every other bench I have seen ties with a C2D @ 3GHz, and the 2.4 on the list here shows less time.
Weird. It is near fast as Intel Core 2 qqqquuuaaaadddddd.
wolfeking
banned
c2q is not that great anymore. Not to say I don't want one, in a laptop version, with something like a Quadro FX3700m or the like, but that is not worth it when you can get a i7 for the same price.
But yea. If it is only giving .2 seconds or less with 2 more threads then it is poorly optimized and probably only reading 2 or 3 threads.
But yea. If it is only giving .2 seconds or less with 2 more threads then it is poorly optimized and probably only reading 2 or 3 threads.
Hahaha 'Quuuuaaaddd'.
Now I've got everybody saying it. The C2Q is still pretty good considering how old it is, but yeah I agree with you. They're still pretty expensive and an i7 would be a much smarter choice.
Yeah it probably doesn't read all the threads, but remember it's made in Visual Basic.NET and compared to something like C# or C++, VB.NET is fairly limited in what you can do, so enabling it to read all threads is tricky, if not impossible. I just ran the benchmark again to see which cores/threads it was reading from, seems like #1 and #2 are the most used, so I'd say it's only reading from 2 cores.
I'll see if I can optimize it but it'd be pretty difficult I think. :/
wolfeking
banned
don't worry about it. It is good for what it is, but as I was saying, it is not the best for comparing at all. 2 threads or more, it still should read processor performance accurately. As I said, mine should tie with a 3Ghz C2D and likewise if only reading 2 threads, a 3GHz C2Q, but it is behind.
Yeah it's not going to be the best for comparison and yes your Celeron should tie with a C2D @ 3.0GHz.
Interesting to note too how the 64-bit times are way faster than the 32-bit times. Not sure if it's just a glitch or what.
Still trying to get some code together which reads system information such as the OS version (easy to do), amount of RAM installed, CPU name/model/clockspeed (both harder) and possibly GPU (may not be necessary).