bomberboysk
Active Member
None, because most benchmarks are based on FP performance, which intels are alot better at, as well as true processing power, which the amd processors are still about the same as intel core 2 line.
Official Superpi Mod Ranking Thread
- Thread starter bomberboysk
- Start date
None, because most benchmarks are based on FP performance, which intels are alot better at, as well as true processing power, which the amd processors are still about the same as intel core 2 line.
spynoodle
Active Member
Bet I'll still get kicked off the Top 50 Intel if I get my Pentium 4 520 over 4GHz and upload a score.
Also, what do you do if you OC a CPU higher after you've already upload a score from it?
bomberboysk
Active Member
Bet I'll still get kicked off the Top 50 Intel if I get my Pentium 4 520 over 4GHz and upload a score.
Upload another score and send me a PM or leave a visitor message so i can delete your old row from the spreadsheet.
I said real apps too, not just benches.
Bet I'll still get kicked off the Top 50 Intel if I get my Pentium 4 520 over 4GHz and upload a score.
Well, level playing field is just the core amounts. There's different architecture's plus cache size and of course clock speed. Different architecture is the most difference really. Like nehalam architecture is at the top right now, then core 2, then Phenom II, etc etc.
spynoodle
Active Member
I don't need to yet. I was just wondering for the future in case I upload a score from my P4 @ 3.5GHz, then OC it to 4GHz later on. Thanks for the info!
I know, I was just mocking the sluggishness of Netburst.
Added as well
Come on AMD guys, i know there are more of you out there, 3 scores is pathetic
Hold your horses! As soon as I get my RAM back from RMA I'll bench my Phenom! Though I think last time I did it I got around 11-15 seconds or so.
Thats a really broad range there, plus I doubt that...my 555 got 16.8 seconds at 4.2ghz. So unless you have some extreme cooling it's almost impossible to get an AMD chip under 15 seconds.
Domain_Man
New Member
Tightened my ram timings and increased the oc just a tiny bit and my score improved a little
It's on DICE...hence the real temp at -15 (thats all the lower real temp reads)
But yeah I did kill the chip, it would no longer POST after I shut it down and tried to start it back up on air. That sucked because that 540 was an exceptionally binned chip. My daily OC was 4.6ghz (200x23) at 1.375 Vcore on that chip using a TRUE cooler.
But yeah I did kill the chip, it would no longer POST after I shut it down and tried to start it back up on air. That sucked because that 540 was an exceptionally binned chip. My daily OC was 4.6ghz (200x23) at 1.375 Vcore on that chip using a TRUE cooler.
Last edited:
NVX_185 you need to submit your score here-
http://spreadsheets0.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dGNhMVQ2RUtMdkNTYzNpU29EN1JNeUE6MQ
How come you lowered the multiplier? I bet the CPU is still way plenty stable on stock volts with the multi at 20 or 21 (turbo) with 160 base clock.
http://spreadsheets0.google.com/viewform?hl=en&formkey=dGNhMVQ2RUtMdkNTYzNpU29EN1JNeUE6MQ
How come you lowered the multiplier? I bet the CPU is still way plenty stable on stock volts with the multi at 20 or 21 (turbo) with 160 base clock.
bomberboysk
Active Member
Remember folks, there is a 100 post requirement.
Domain_Man
New Member
Did you sell your 540 87dtna?
bomberboysk
Active Member
If i remember right, he cooked it while under dice.