Post the original with the EXIF data if you really did take the pic.
"WTF is up with all these noobs claiming pictures that aren't theirs!???"
Sorry about that Vroom, I meant Speedy
By hugely I mean the HDR editing, which involves multiple shots blabla which is to me a huge edit from what the first picture looks like... But whatever I'm not going and do not want to fight over that.
I don't know how much proof you want houseofbugs but here's the folder with all my photos from my trip to Europe along with the data of that particular photo.
Anyone else have a problem with using HDR photo's? Is this a rule we should establish? I didn't think it would really count as editing, as it's more of a technique than an edit.
2 Entries left
Callibretto, Do you have any other pictures, something more cityscape like and less city streets like?
And Houseofbugs, good job on the one picture (I didn't notice it at all), but your getting a little out of hand with the accusations now.
Please stop with this BS! The only noob stealing pictures is ***** and we know him very well, he's been spamming the forum for a while now.Yeah I believe ya now. I just wanted to be sure because there are a lot of noobs on here that like to steal images.
Second, Speedy, what's your definition of "cityscape"? because you accepted Calibreto's picture but you didn't accept Punk's which are relatively similar.
Alright, I have to question this one cause it looks so much like an advertisement for denver
A photo featuring a vast, city setting. Pretty much type cityscape in google and thats the sorta thing I want to see. Theres a couple pictures on here that could reflect the topic more, but I don't really want to make a mass recall in photos. My logic on this one is Calibretto's was taken at street level of a single street, whereas Punk's looks as though it *could* be considered as a city scape. I'm gonna look at all the pictures again and make a better judgement though...