Shlouski
VIP Member
I feel like buying a case should have taken priority over a custom loop, but to each his own I suppose...
Agreed. These days there are many good cases around that aren't expensive, in contrast to only a few years ago.
I feel like buying a case should have taken priority over a custom loop, but to each his own I suppose...
After I upgrade to a 4K monitor I'll get something like a 900D.I feel like buying a case should have taken priority over a custom loop, but to each his own I suppose...
What monitor do you have now? Surely a case would be a more practical purchase.After I upgrade to a 4K monitor I'll get something like a 900D.
To be honest I've had much more luck with WD. The Seagate SSHD I had died after a few months and the Seagate 3TB I had after about 2 years. The life span depends on lots of things though.Where is my hard drive to smash!?!?! I have 35 pound maul axe......
I'm just tease. It is true that WD got broken easily as I take look inside. I had WD failed on me in 3 month. After I got SeaGate, they never failed on me. One of them are almost 7 years old. HSGT is hard drive owed by WD that I never tried, but heard it is good.
I'm sorry.I use a 32' 1080P 60Hz TV
why?I'm sorry.
Because TV's suck as monitors.why?
A 32" 1080p TV as your monitor? Low pixel density, horribly inaccurate colors, high response times, input lag...why?
I used the nvidia CP to adjust the colors and it looks decent. As for the response times and pixel density I can't argue but that's why I need that 4K 1ms response time 28' monitor.A 32" 1080p TV as your monitor? Low pixel density, horribly inaccurate colors, high response times, input lag...
I used the nvidia CP to adjust the colors and it looks decent. As for the response times and pixel density I can't argue but that's why I need that 4K 1ms response time 28' monitor.
Problem is, the 8350 can't really handle more than 100 FPS, it can barely get over 60 in GTA V. If I move to Intel, I will be stuck with 1080p. I'm ok with no AA. I play GTA V at 4K with DSR and it never dips under 50. I've also seen YT videos of people getting over 60 FPS in Battlefield with no MSAA.4k at that size would be wasted. I'd go for a 1440p monitor. Even a 980Ti will struggle on top end games without lowering the settings right down to achieve 60fps.
I've tried a 28 and 27" 4k and 1440p 144hz monitor, both on maximum settings. The difference picture quality wise is not a huge deal. Maybe a few extra jaggies. That's going to be almost un noticeable with greatly reduced settings.
120/144hz for me is much nicer however.
You can tweak the color profile but it doesn't change the limited color gamut that the monitor is capable of, and something which IPS monitors do a fantastic job at.I used the nvidia CP to adjust the colors and it looks decent. As for the response times and pixel density I can't argue but that's why I need that 4K 1ms response time 28' monitor.
Problem is, the 8350 can't really handle more than 100 FPS, it can barely get over 60 in GTA V. If I move to Intel, I will be stuck with 1080p. I'm ok with no AA. I play GTA V at 4K with DSR and it never dips under 50. I've also seen YT videos of people getting over 60 FPS in Battlefield with no MSAA.
How do you know the GPU does nothing? Are you looking at the CPU and GPU utilization during those times? Big monitors are great, but 4K is a HUGE step from a 1080p 32" TV. A 2560x1440 display would be a great upgrade IMO, and you can find those with 120Hz refresh rates with Gsync/Freesync.But again even on low settings where the GPU does nothing I can't get over 100 FPS because of the 8350 bottlenecking. Plus I'm used to big monitors. But OK I'll look at some 1440p gsync screens too
Of course I monitor them. Even at ultra at 1440p (DSR) with 110 scaling the GPU drops to 80%ish sometimes in less demanding maps.How do you know the GPU does nothing? Are you looking at the CPU and GPU utilization during those times? Big monitors are great, but 4K is a HUGE step from a 1080p 32" TV. A 2560x1440 display would be a great upgrade IMO, and you can find those with 120Hz refresh rates with Gsync/Freesync.
A 32" 1080p TV as your monitor? Low pixel density, horribly inaccurate colors, high response times, input lag...
afford all TV? What?That is not true. It didn't mean it is afford all TV.
Huh? I wasn't even quoting you...That is not true. It didn't mean it is afford all TV.