Post your SuperPi Score!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Cleric7x9 said:
i went straight to 3.6 because i wanted a 1:1 ratio without overclocking RAM

superpi2.jpg


there we go, with my name in notepad for those unbelievers out there. also, thats with the superpi mod
Click to expand...

just curious why im not on the list
 
^ Sorry, i just updated from the last update date.
Did that make sense?
Yours seems to be before then.

I'm adding it too my list that I'm gonna keep updating.
 
Cleric7x9 said:
just curious why im not on the list
Click to expand...

how did you get 12 seconds at 2399mhz.. i have a core 2 at 2668 and only scored 21 seconds

btw: the superpi in the first post doesnt do milliseconds anymore. will update my score with milliseconds.

edit:
untitled-1.jpg

new score: 20.484 seconds, 2710mhz
 
Last edited:
tidyboy21 said:
I think that this is the best time that I'm gona get, not bad though hey :cool: This is on air by the way.

10280.jpg
Click to expand...

Wow.
That's the fastest so i think thatguy16 should go buy some ln2 to compete lol.
How much air is that on anyways?
You got like some wind turbines on that thing or what? :eek:
 
thatguy16 : try lowering ram timings. i got about a fourth of a second out of lowering the timings from 5-5-5-15 to 4-4-4-12. could help some if its stable.
 
Respital said:
Wow.
That's the fastest so i think thatguy16 should go buy some ln2 to compete lol.
How much air is that on anyways?
You got like some wind turbines on that thing or what? :eek:
Click to expand...

i have gotten 10.02s at 4.7ghz, didn't get a screenshot though :P

I'm in Pennsylvania right now, you wait till i get home :D:D
 
fade2green514 said:
how did you get 12 seconds at 2399mhz.. i have a core 2 at 2668 and only scored 21 seconds
Click to expand...

well i was at 3.6Ghz, not 2.4Ghz. You are seeing a lowered multiplier because the CPU wasnt being used at the moment. also, the e8400 is better than the e6300 for reasons other than just clock speed.
 
Cleric7x9 said:
well i was at 3.6Ghz, not 2.4Ghz. You are seeing a lowered multiplier because the CPU wasnt being used at the moment. also, the e8400 is better than the e6300 for reasons other than just clock speed.
Click to expand...

its a core 2 duo. the processor has no difference except cache size and wire size. and even though it has a 300% of my processors cache size that should only make up about 5-10% (maximum) of any performance difference.

i can see it performing that well at 3.6ghz, but cpu-z tells us its at 2.4ghz. you should probably get a proper reading from it.
 
Last edited:
fade2green514 said:
its a core 2 duo. the processor has no difference except cache size and wire size. and even though it has a 300% of my processors cache size that should only make up about 5-10% (maximum) of any performance difference.

i can see it performing that well at 3.6ghz, but cpu-z tells us its at 2.4ghz. you should probably get a proper reading from it.
Click to expand...

sigh :rolleyes:

you should look up EIST and C1E.

it drops the clock speeds when the CPU is not being used. CPU-Z is correct, and so am i. you are wrong. the reading is proper.
 
fade2green514 said:
its a core 2 duo. the processor has no difference except cache size and wire size. and even though it has a 300% of my processors cache size that should only make up about 5-10% (maximum) of any performance difference.

i can see it performing that well at 3.6ghz, but cpu-z tells us its at 2.4ghz. you should probably get a proper reading from it.
Click to expand...
Nope, clock for clock the E8xxx series will outperform the E6xxx series, they are newer, use a 45nm process, and a better performing architecture.

Also, C1E reduces the multiplier and voltage when the CPU isn't being used, you aren't seeing the actual clock speed that was used when the test was ran.
 
mep916 said:
Cleric is correct. EIST and C1E can be disabled in the BIOS.
Click to expand...

[-0MEGA-];1038901 said:
Nope, clock for clock the E8xxx series will outperform the E6xxx series, they are newer, use a 45nm process, and a better performing architecture.

Also, C1E reduces the multiplier and voltage when the CPU isn't being used, you aren't seeing the actual clock speed that was used when the test was ran.
Click to expand...

thanks for the support guys :P
 
13.0 seconds???????????????????? WTF - superpi must be broken or something

i ran it on a server with these specs:

2x X5365 Xeons (Quad Core @ 3.0GHz, 8MB Cache and 1333MHz FSB) - Server 2008 Enterprise x64 and 8gb ram

if superpi took advantage of SMP it would be like 1 second lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top