Ps3 Or Xbox 360?

Which system will you buy?

  • PS3

    Votes: 38 31.4%
  • Xbox 360

    Votes: 47 38.8%
  • Neither, my computer kicks their ass.

    Votes: 36 29.8%

  • Total voters
    121
Well it is 4ghz overclock, Anyways, PS3 Will win due to games... Always have and always will... Not that i like Sony i like xbox's but playstations have better games always have done, The gamecube was a let down, And i heard the gamecube 2 (Not known name yet) Is going to look like a mini fridge
 
have nintendo revolution is nothinglike a mini fridge, its more like a external dvd drive! and playstation only have a few launch games so far, whilst the xbox, accordingto some sources, have 40+
 
Yes but the xbox needs immediate game support, the PS3 doesn't. The xbox360 is marketed more as a home entertainment station, the ps3 is as well but it has a better design as a full fledged console.
 
Charlie7940 said:
I definitely smell a fanboy...

I don't see how you can openly state that Xbox was better than PS2. Whoever owns a PS2 will say it's better and whoever owns a Xbox will say it's better. I think it comes down to a matter of opinion.

I have both. And online on both. I can see a considerable difference in graphics between the 2, with xbox's being better. Also, xbox's online is a lot better...although you need to pay for xbox live, it is well worth it(more support for games and the voip is a lot beter IMO)
 
I have always liked Playstation, but I have come to like the Xbox too. I think im gonna go with the PS3 though, just because I have so many ps2 games
 
I think nto suporting Xbox games on the 360 is retarted, I would not get it just for that. With a PS3 i can get PS1,2,and 3 games.
 
jonskijet said:
4. xbox live. xbox live. why doesn't sony see that the future of gaming is online? If the ps3 can utilize a online service for every game, they will hae much competition against xbox.

i will never pay to play, ever. it doesn't really matter how good the online gameplay is for either system, if it's not free, then there is no chance i will ever use it. that's just my decision though, i'm most definelty part of a minority on this one.
 
4W4K3 said:
i will never pay to play, ever. it doesn't really matter how good the online gameplay is for either system, if it's not free, then there is no chance i will ever use it. that's just my decision though, i'm most definelty part of a minority on this one.

Same here... I especially like the free online play of the ps2
 
personally if I had a better computer i'd choose the bottom one, but the xbox 360 sounds and looks sweet :)
 
I think nto suporting Xbox games on the 360 is retarted, I would not get it just for that. With a PS3 I can get PS1,2,and 3 games.
Hehe its ironic that we want backwards compatability but for something like windows we complain about flaws and bugginess (50% of which are because of their backwards compatabiily, 40% because of market demands for fashion before function and the last 10% for actual errors) hehe
 
flame1117 said:
I think nto suporting Xbox games on the 360 is retarted, I would not get it just for that. With a PS3 i can get PS1,2,and 3 games.
the 360 can play xbox games
EDIT: just read another article and apparently only selected games will be backwards compatible, so im guessing halo and halo 2 will be, which is all that matters
 
Last edited:
The thing is the question 'What will you buy?' is often cut short by people just buying whatever comes out first or just buying something offhand with no knowledge. I would buy neither and simply upgrade my PC with an emulator for the games; But thats a bit Warezy.

Heres a quick little story:
Walked into my local Game Store.
Overheard staff conversation.
Yeh some guy rang up complaining that by accident he had bought a DVD player from us and it wouldn't play his Xbox games, i said we didn't sell them. He said he'd bought one that looked like a slim line silver DVD player. I said Yes its called the slim PS2.

My point being?
People buy whatever has got the games they want or they just buy ignorantly.

Nintendo = for children
Xbox = Multiplayer
PS2 = Creativity


Not saying that the formats don;t blend but thats how it stands.
 
damn some people are ignorant. ps3 2x faster than the xbox 360? my ass. plz do some research on the specs of the systems, then talk. First off, the PS3's cell proccessor CAN be faster than the xbox 360's 3 processors. But its extremely hard to code for. considering its wat... 11 sub cell proccessors? its a more inovative design, while the xbox 360 just went for 3 beefy CPUs. but thats just the processors. the main concern i have with the ps3 is its gpu board bandwith restriction. anyways, whoever can code the most efficiently for which system, will make that system the "fastest". these systems are so god damn powerfull, that i doubt game devs will even make anything that will have a speed difference between the 2 systems. anyways, the ps3 comes out like half a year after the xbox 360, so sony has alot of time to use new technologys and if they just stick to the current technology they have made for it so far, in half a year the price of those chips will go down significantly, allowing sony to sell their PS3's at a lower cost than the xbox 360 when it is released. now for the game selections thats another story. I think that showing of the xbox 360 microsoft did was completely horrid. they are trying to turn the god damn thing into a entertainment system. i am not spending 500 dollars for a god damn movie player, or a mp3 player, or a web surfing comp, i want that 500 dollars to be spent JUST ON A GAMING MACHINE. anyways, the systems are 1 year apart, so why not get both.
 
If i had to buy one of the consoles, i would choose the Xbox 360, but i won't get either of them, because my world revolves around computers! :P
 
Back
Top