Post your SuperPi Score!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now that i read it again, it was very selfish...

but life goes on. people will make new threads and new stickies and guides.
 
THERMAL-REACTOR said:
SuperPi Ranks:
Updated 09/30 2009​

Fastest CPU's:
Intel: 8.954 - Core i7 920 @ 4410MHz (THERMAL-REACTOR)
AMD: 17.534 - X3 720 @ 3940MHz (zer0_c00l)


Top Three:
1.) 8.954 -- THERMAL-REACTOR (i7 920 @ 4410)
2.) 9.015 -- mikesrex (i7 920 @ 4410)
3.) 9.375 -- Matticus (E8500 @ 4968)



Top 10:
4.) 9.594 -- kkpudge7 (i7 920 @ 4305)
5.) 9.702 -- WhiteFireDragon (E8600 @ 4826)
6.) 9.951 -- ThatGuy16 (E8400 @ 4806)
7.) 9.968 -- bubblescivic (E8400 @ 4680)
8.) 9.968 -- mikesrex (E8400 @ 4680)
9.) 10.202 -- susik89 (i7 920 @ 3998)
10.) 10.280 -- tidyboy21 (E8500 @ 4599)


Top 20:
11.) 10.307 -- jkrause6 (i7 920 @ 4045)
12.) 10.390 -- bebopin64 (i7 920 @ 4031)
13.) 10.390 -- yhahh (E8400 @ 4500)
14.) 10.824 -- lovely? (E8400 @ 4410)
15.) 10.888 -- markallen (Q9550 @ 4378)
16.) 10.953 -- vix (E8400 @ 4260)
17.) 10.982 -- jevery (Q9650 @ 4338)
18.) 11.000 -- bigrich0086 (Q9450 @ 3600)
19.) 11.024 -- Domain Man (Q9550 @ 4302)
20.) 11.311 -- MouSe (i7 920 @ 3675))


11.375 -- F.i.T.H (E8400 @ 4203)
11.384 -- [-0MEGA-] (Q9550 @ 4100
11.466 -- houseofbugs (E8400 @ 4050)
11.625 -- DirtyD86 (E8400 @ 4000)
11.731 -- zer0_c00l (E8400 @ 4005)
11.734 -- Springy182 (Q9550 @ 4016)
11.887 -- bomberboysk (Q9450 @ 3996)
11.953 -- MosIncredible (E8400 @ 3915)
11.965 -- XDRoX (E7200 @ 4380)
12.049 -- [-0MEGA-] (E8400 @ 4000)
12.330 -- Bodaggit23 (i7 920 @ 3430)
12.339 -- wilson (E8500 @ 3800)
12.540 -- The_Other_One (i7 920 @ 3320)
12.796 -- littlenlnga (E6750 @ 4024)
12.844 -- shenry (E8400 @ 3726)
12.859 -- Cleric7x9 (E8400 @ 3600)
12.906 -- Nexolus (Q6600 @ 3960)
13.172 -- Bootup05 (Q660 @ 4005)
13.276 -- tidyboy21 (E6600 @ 3906)
13.315 -- markallen (E6750 @ 3880)
13.369 -- Vipernitrox (Q6700 @ 3902)
13.516 -- just_a_noob (E5200 @ 4248)
14.187 -- MatrixEvo (Q6600 @ 3600)
14.640 -- Rusian777 (i7 920 @ 2800)
14.750 -- Ambushed (E6550 @ 3484)
14.926 -- Midnight_fox1 (Q6600 @ 3600)
15.078 -- Gareth (Q9450 @ 3181)
15.148 -- funkysnair (Q6600 @ 3600)
15.172 -- Casie (E6600 @ 3380)
15.385 -- Aastii (E6750 @ 3500)
15.985 -- Vipernitrox (E6420 @ 3300)
16.203 -- TFT (E6750 @ 3200)
16.229 -- Bootup05 (Q6600 @ 3400)
16.250 -- Bl00dFox (E6600 @ 3243)
16.359 -- skidude (Q9550 @ 2980)
16.375 -- Jet (E4500 @ 3500)
16.724 -- Kesava (Q6600 @ 3401)
16.879 -- MIK3daG33K (E4500 @ 3400)
16.895 -- Garethman!! (Q9450 @ 2840)
16.973 -- Nodz86 (Q9550 @ 2830)
17.125 -- Dazzeerr (Q6600 @ 2997)
17.282 -- Respital (E6850 @ 3000)
17.319 -- [-0MEGA-] (E6400 @ 3400)
17.457 -- gamerman4 (Q6600 @ 3000)
17.534 -- zer0_c00l (X2 720 @ 3940)
17.598 -- ScOuT (Q9300 @ 3000)
17.862 -- Mitch? (X3 720 @ 3978)
18.304 -- Bootup05 (E6400 @ 3440)
18.533 -- Hyde01 (T9300 @ 2493)
19.312 -- WhiteFireDragon (E2180 @ 3200)
19.564 -- gigantojim (X4 955 @ 3612)
19.610 -- newguy5 (E6750 @ 2670)
20.484 -- fade2green514 (E6300 @ 2709)
20.592 -- ramodkk (E2160 @ 3000)
22.311 -- Kornowski (Q6600 @ 2405)
22.579 -- Darkserge (E2220 @ 2753)
23.016 -- voyagerfan99 (T8300 @ 1596)
23.282 -- Glliw (x4 940BE @ 3000)
23.608 -- newjacksm (X4 940 @ 3000)
24.628 -- dark666apoc (X4 9850 @ 3250)
24.672 -- Mr. Johanssen (Phenom 7750 @ 3300)
25.329 -- ThatGuy16 (X2 5600+ @ 3439)
29.688 -- El DJ (X2 5200+ @ 3009)
31.181 -- aviation_man (x4 9950 @ 2611)
31.188 -- PatPheFox (X4 9600 @ 2812)
31.246 -- linkin93 (E4500 @ 2200)
31.251 -- Intel_man (E6300 @ 1866)
35.750 -- Darkserge (P4 @ 3910)
36.614 -- The_Other_One (M 540 @ 1862)
37.797 -- Fear Of Dreams (X2 BE-2400 @ 2422)
42.032 -- voyagerfan99 (X2 3800+ @ 2200)
42.323 -- Gooberman (X2 3800+ @ 2009MHz)
1m 01.985 -- pokemon89 (P4 @ 2394)
1m 33.610 -- The_Other_One (Atom N280 @ 997)
Click to expand...



Heres the list, it will need some updating. There is alot to go through.

Also may I suggest we start sorting them by cooling as well. Maybe something like Air-Water-Phase-Ln2.
 
Last edited:
THERMAL-REACTOR said:
Heres the list, it will need some updating. There is alot to go through.

Also may I suggest we start sorting them by cooling as well. Maybe something like Air-Water-Phase-Ln2.
Click to expand...

do you not think that would be a little confusing and, well, pointless? I mean it is for showing your benchmark, cooling doesn't matter really, it is the speeds you were able to get and how well you were able to number crunch and that
 
Aastii said:
do you not think that would be a little confusing and, well, pointless? I mean it is for showing your benchmark, cooling doesn't matter really, it is the speeds you were able to get and how well you were able to number crunch and that
Click to expand...
Although, on some Overclocking-record sites they sort out the cooling methods, to show what they had to go through to achieve that kind of overclock. That may not apply as much here, though.
 
I really do not think it would be too much work to just ask the poster what cooling solution they are using. You could even simplify and do Air/Water and Phase/Ln2. The only reason I suggest this is because most of us have modest setups and use air cooling. This way people can more accurately compare themselves then to the extreme cooling setups that are not used day to day.
 
THERMAL-REACTOR said:
I really do not think it would be too much work to just ask the poster what cooling solution they are using. You could even simplify and do Air/Water and Phase/Ln2. The only reason I suggest this is because most of us have modest setups and use air cooling. This way people can more accurately compare themselves then to the extreme cooling setups that are not used day to day.
Click to expand...
Or go a step further, create something with google docs that allows scores to be submitted with detailed info including cpu/memory brand/ timings/clocks/cooling/etc, as all those have an effect on superpi times.
 
Jet said:
If I have some time this afternoon, I might get around to compiling the stats.
Click to expand...

That's not necessary. We have a history of every single revision made in the OP. All I can say is that the admins are working on a solution and all this will be settled soon. I'm a fan of the google docs approach as well. It could be implemented in a number of ways.
 
bomberboysk said:
Or go a step further, create something with google docs that allows scores to be submitted with detailed info including cpu/memory brand/ timings/clocks/cooling/etc, as all those have an effect on superpi times.
Click to expand...

I really like that idea because instead of it just being showoff what you got thread it could be a useful tool for finding out what setups work and do not work.
 
mep916 said:
That's not necessary. We have a history of every single revision made in the OP. All I can say is that the admins are working on a solution and all this will be settled soon. I'm a fan of the google docs approach as well. It could be implemented in a number of ways.
Click to expand...

No worries--I got the first page or two and then decided it was a waste of time :P.
 
mep916 said:
That's not necessary. We have a history of every single revision made in the OP. All I can say is that the admins are working on a solution and all this will be settled soon. I'm a fan of the google docs approach as well. It could be implemented in a number of ways.
Click to expand...

That exactly why I was asking, was thinking of adapting one of my others purely for computer forums i.e http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0As2Tqq7H7KZFdFQ1aVkzZGJIXzhHR0ZzUWNyY2JGRFE&hl=en tabs for different number of cores and cooling etc
That's how I did it on ocn anyway http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/644047-amd-cpus-2d-benchmarks-thread.html if your curious, they are embedded there tho which helps, not sure how hard that would be to implement :confused:
 
so whats going to happen with this thread then?

I wanted to download that same version of Superpi that i originally tested on my system so time back and compare it to my new clock....but now i cant!...im not even on the list!

If the threads not put back up,someone should create a new one...or a mod take over the thread!

Hope it gets resolved soon :)
 
Last edited:
El Gappo said:
That exactly why I was asking, was thinking of adapting one of my others purely for computer forums i.e http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0As2Tqq7H7KZFdFQ1aVkzZGJIXzhHR0ZzUWNyY2JGRFE&hl=en tabs for different number of cores and cooling etc
That's how I did it on ocn anyway http://www.overclock.net/amd-cpus/644047-amd-cpus-2d-benchmarks-thread.html if your curious, they are embedded there tho which helps, not sure how hard that would be to implement :confused:
Click to expand...

I've searched the interwebz a little... unless I'm mistaken, it looks as though you need to do some coding on the server side of the forum to embed a spreadsheet. I've no idea how they do it at OCN, but I don't see any type of vB plug in (installed on the server side) that allows you to copy/paste some code as a user and embed it in using bb code.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top