m3incorp said:
Again I disagree. It has nothing to do with making money. Many people enjoy the best photo that is possible, and many many times that takes a bit of editing.
Again, your missing the point! The point is to showcase the photographer and their skill with the camera. Not their skill in editing. Thus, this thread is called "Unedited". There is another thread for the editing if you want to use that.
If you want to argue about the validity of the pictures and anything done to it is editing, that's a totally different topic.
m3incorp said:
Even if you crop something out of the photo, that is editing. Now how many people like to leave the red eye in, when it can even be eliminated in camera.
Granted, most people dont know the difference. Anything you do to a picture is editing.
m3incorp said:
Just so you know, not all pictures require that the noise be reduced.
Well, obvious! Just so you know that's the quality of the camera. And I'm sure you know that.
m3incorp said:
I just suggested something that is on the other side of your coin. Expect that on a forum!!
Well, yeah, that's life. There are always people on opposite ends of the table. Your just totally missing the whole point of this thread.
m3incorp said:
All cameras have some limitations. Remember cameras can't exactly duplicate what the human eye sees, so therefore comes the need to sometimes do a little editing. Just saying that most of us do at least a little editing......
Again, your inability to comprehend the thread itself is causing you to flare up all these things.
Like I said, this is to show the photographer and their skill with the camera. Given that they did not reduce red eye prior to the camera, that is their skill and ability. If you wanted pictures that are slightly edited or moderately edited, that's where you start a different thread.
You are just totally missing the point of the thread, but responding to the question only.