ganzey
banned
wouldnt that be your fault?
Post your SuperPi Score!
- Thread starter Geoff
- Start date
- Status
wouldnt that be your fault?
Ryeong
New Member
Hehe, i wonder how a C2D would score with those clocks. (considering that this software is not multi-threaded, i7 etc would be a waste)..
6.00 Ghz on C2D 8600! That would surely give a nice score
It's double fail on my behalf.. cheers!
El Gappo
New Member
An 8600 at 6ghz would literally rip my time in half lol. ATM the 980x's are almost the quickest in this benchmark purely because of the unlocked multi and tweakability but even then they disable 4 cores to reach the higher clocks. The I5 dual cores like 87tdna's are completely dominating!
Here is the world record list http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/superpi/rankings Impressive eh!
Here is the world record list http://hwbot.org/rankings/benchmark/superpi/rankings Impressive eh!
ganzey
banned
Hehe, i wonder how a C2D would score with those clocks. (considering that this software is not multi-threaded, i7 etc would be a waste)..
6.00 Ghz on C2D 8600! That would surely give a nice score
yep
Dice run, can't seem to get the temp below -15.....and whats weird is it says -25 in the bios. But there's no way I'm going to get to 6ghz because I've hit a base clock wall at 246. I tried taking the multiplier down but still won't POST, so I guess 5.6 is all I can get out of it.
Ryeong
New Member
WOW grats on the sub 8 second run man! You need to get your ass a thermometer and some awesome ram like mine quick smart
Thanks! I'm 401st place in hwbot now, I was 398th when I first submitted it.
http://hwbot.org/community/submission/981108_87dtna_superpi_core_i3_540_7sec_677ms
About my ram, it's suppose to run 9-9-9-27 1t at 2000mhz, and I have it set to cas9 in the bios but when I boot it boots cas10. I don't know why.
I used to have some 1600 cas7 ram, but traded it.
Ryeong
New Member
57 sec lmao.. guess the real result was 1 min? you edited the last part lol..
Edit: Eye-fail!!! I didn't say the 01 min before the seconds.. fail! I though it went from 57sec to 02sec lol..
Last edited:
PaulPool
New Member
Those shades ain't helping you, huh? haha ; )
So I'm guessing for my old emachines that isn't a good score then.
Ryeong
New Member
PaulPool
New Member
Yeah you're right with that. And this one is at least 6 years old. I've done everything soft-ware wise to speed it up and make it as efficient as possible.
It flies like a brick.
Aastii
VIP Member
Where I am so far:
I know it is slower than my e6750 was (time, not cloks) but that is top 10 AMD and so close to top 5
I tried pushing further to 3.6, both on multiplyer and on raising fsb, but it won't stay stable at 3.6 without voltage higher than 1.512V, but if I go up higher (0.0125V increments) it won't boot. It will post, but not boot to windows
=EDIT=
Using Turbo V I managed to do it Still going further so maybe updates yet
That is completely stable and temps as very good, 23 idle, 39 stress testing
I know it is slower than my e6750 was (time, not cloks
) but that is top 10 AMD and so close to top 5 I tried pushing further to 3.6, both on multiplyer and on raising fsb, but it won't stay stable at 3.6 without voltage higher than 1.512V, but if I go up higher (0.0125V increments) it won't boot. It will post, but not boot to windows
=EDIT=
Using Turbo V I managed to do it
Still going further so maybe updates yet
That is completely stable and temps as very good, 23 idle, 39 stress testing
Last edited:
spynoodle
Active Member
Yeah, tell me about it.
It took like, 20 minutes on mine for the full 24 loop.- Status