While we are on about screenshots, I have the super pi time of when i oc'ed to 3.6 (when i managed to get 1 run in without super pi crashing), can i just post that with my processor currently OCed at 3.4, because i don't want to go through getting it stable to be able to print screen and post and that, the evidence is there after all
linkin93- could you please state what the actually speed during the test was. In that screenshot, speedstep has turned on and underclocked your CPU.
aviation_man- Please download this new version Super PI 1.5 and run the test again. The new one gives a more accurate time allowing me to place you on the list.
bigrich0086- If you could post some screen shots please, I can then validate your score. If you haven't in a week the score comes off the list.
The CPU shows 3.2, that is the current OC i have, in reality when i got that score i was on 3.5, but asi said in a previous post, don't really want to have to OC, get it stable and try to run again, super pi is a bitch when overclocked past 3.4, it doesn't like working on my system for some strange reason
Yay I'm last If you want to be specific, it's an Atom N280. Actually that Acer's getting replaced due to a flaw with the keyboard... And that "M 540" is a Celeron.
Hmm...and now with this list, I'm tempted to push this processor a bit more. I've yet to try anything above 3.3GHz
BTW... I wish I still had some slower computers, but my slowest is a 386SX/25MHz. I could see about running superpi on there sometime :3
Heres mine, didn't take too much work to get her up to 4.3Ghz. I'm gonna try getting it up to 4.5Ghz later on and see if I can get close to that 8s barrier
Woot i'm on the list.
I'll post my new score up when all my new gear gets here and after i OC my E4500 hopefully to 3ghz or higher... hoping for 2.8ghz at least even and maybe up to 3.2ghz
EDIT: Guys, i'm having trouble with superpi. it works once and then whenever i calculate any number of pi digits it hangs.
That's quick. Almost 2x better than my E4500.... I can't wait to overclock that thing.
Do you guys think an 11x multi or 10x multi is better? I hear that core 2 duo's like higher fsb due to bandwidth or something, so that means a 10x/9x multi right? I'm hoping to go for 3ghz. I've already written down some increments to start with...